diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/mlibc/options/ansi/musl-generic-math/__tandf.c')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/mlibc/options/ansi/musl-generic-math/__tandf.c | 54 |
1 files changed, 54 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/mlibc/options/ansi/musl-generic-math/__tandf.c b/lib/mlibc/options/ansi/musl-generic-math/__tandf.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..25047ee --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/mlibc/options/ansi/musl-generic-math/__tandf.c @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +/* origin: FreeBSD /usr/src/lib/msun/src/k_tanf.c */ +/* + * Conversion to float by Ian Lance Taylor, Cygnus Support, ian@cygnus.com. + * Optimized by Bruce D. Evans. + */ +/* + * ==================================================== + * Copyright 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. + * + * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this + * software is freely granted, provided that this notice + * is preserved. + * ==================================================== + */ + +#include "libm.h" + +/* |tan(x)/x - t(x)| < 2**-25.5 (~[-2e-08, 2e-08]). */ +static const double T[] = { + 0x15554d3418c99f.0p-54, /* 0.333331395030791399758 */ + 0x1112fd38999f72.0p-55, /* 0.133392002712976742718 */ + 0x1b54c91d865afe.0p-57, /* 0.0533812378445670393523 */ + 0x191df3908c33ce.0p-58, /* 0.0245283181166547278873 */ + 0x185dadfcecf44e.0p-61, /* 0.00297435743359967304927 */ + 0x1362b9bf971bcd.0p-59, /* 0.00946564784943673166728 */ +}; + +float __tandf(double x, int odd) +{ + double_t z,r,w,s,t,u; + + z = x*x; + /* + * Split up the polynomial into small independent terms to give + * opportunities for parallel evaluation. The chosen splitting is + * micro-optimized for Athlons (XP, X64). It costs 2 multiplications + * relative to Horner's method on sequential machines. + * + * We add the small terms from lowest degree up for efficiency on + * non-sequential machines (the lowest degree terms tend to be ready + * earlier). Apart from this, we don't care about order of + * operations, and don't need to to care since we have precision to + * spare. However, the chosen splitting is good for accuracy too, + * and would give results as accurate as Horner's method if the + * small terms were added from highest degree down. + */ + r = T[4] + z*T[5]; + t = T[2] + z*T[3]; + w = z*z; + s = z*x; + u = T[0] + z*T[1]; + r = (x + s*u) + (s*w)*(t + w*r); + return odd ? -1.0/r : r; +} |